McCombs School of Business
McCombs MBA Alumni Network

Faculty Profiles

Caroline Bartel

Caroline Bartel

Caroline Bartel 
Management Department

Today’s work environments are a far cry from the work groups of yesteryear. Organizational structures are different; business moves at a much more rapid pace; and individuals frequently work on multiple teams—sometimes virtually, without coming into direct contact with colleagues. These modern workplace realities can make coordination and collaboration difficult.

Caroline Bartel, assistant professor of management, studies the challenge of how to enhance coordination in organizations. If an organization can cultivate strong relationships with employees, both individuals and work teams function better. Stronger “identification” with the organization means—regardless of physical location or personnel structures—everyone is on the same page.

Employees who “identify” with an organization have a strong overlap between the values and characteristics that define the organization and those they use to define themselves, Bartel explains. This relationship is much more intense than simply being “committed” to the company, a connection that implies an endorsement of values rather than a total intersection.

“An organization has values, norms and specific ways of doing things,” she says. “If you can cultivate identification, you have an implicit understanding about how to think and act” in workplace situations. This connection enables employees to develop—quickly and with limited information—a common set of expectations that allows them to synchronize their actions and make real-time adjustments to fit the situation at hand.

Bartel, who comes to McCombs from NYU’s Stern School of Business, looked at the effects of a community outreach program at Pillsbury. Many companies are increasing their involvement in community outreach programs for a variety of reasons, according to Bartel. “They’re interested in giving back to their communities, and it creates positive impressions in the eyes of potential customers,” she says.

But such community-oriented programs may also cause employees to more closely identify with their companies. Over time, according to Bartel’s research, the experience of working with other employees in a volunteer setting enhanced their positive perceptions of the organization and led them to feel a greater sense of esteem from their company affiliation. The end effect of greater identification was increased cooperation and work effort during normal working situations, Bartel says.

“Pillsbury hadn’t fully considered the impact of its community service initiatives on employees,” Bartel says. Cultivating identification can happen quickly and in unexpected ways. While the methods may not always be obvious, “companies recognize the benefits of identification.”

Ethan Burris

Ethan Burris

Ethan Burris 
Management Department

When something in your work situation isn’t going as well as it could, do you speak up or bite your tongue?

One of the factors driving that decision may be the actions of your boss, according to research conducted by Ethan Burris, assistant professor of management. His current study, “Leadership Influences on Employee Voice Behavior: Is the Door Really open?” examines the effect of leaders’ actions on subordinates’ willingness to offer constructive criticism or improvement-oriented suggestions.

“High-performing employees are in tune to their leaders’ behavior,” explains Burris, who is teaching Introduction to Organizational Behavior this year. So when the boss is closed or unwilling to act on suggestions, those ideas may stop coming to light—which can lead to lower productivity and morale.

On the other hand, a leader that creates a safe, non-threatening atmosphere is more likely to cultivate personal connections with his or her employees. While this can result in a tight “inner circle,” the leader must take care to pay attention to those on the outside so they will feel comfortable contributing ideas.

Burris, who grew up in Indiana and earned his Ph.D. from Cornell University |in May 2005, is interested in why teams make bad decisions. His research in this area involved data collected from employees of a national restaurant chain that had been experiencing an annual turnover rate of 180 percent. The company has used the study’s results to implement changes, such as a revised performance appraisal system and updated management training.

Burris says that while companies may not be able to use most ideas offered by people in the rank and file, one good idea could help a company in unexpected ways. “It’s a small cost to listen,” he says.

Ilan Guedi 
Finance Department

As a new arrival from MIT’s Sloan School of Management, Ilan Guedj, assistant professor of finance at McCombs, is looking forward to continuing his research examining how the organization of a pharmaceutical firm affects the company’s financial decisions.

Guedj completed his dissertation, “Ownership vs. Contract: How Vertical Integration Affects Investment Decisions in Pharmaceutical R&D” and received his Ph.D. in financial economics in May 2005


Born in Courbevoie, France, Guedj and his family later moved to Israel where he served as a lieutenant in the Israeli Army for four years. In 2000, he completed his bachelor’s degree in industrial engineering and management at the Israel Institute of Technology and moved to the United States to continue his education.

This spring, he is teaching Entrepreneurial Finance, which looks at how young firms finance themselves.

“One of the things I try to understand is if the background of an entrepreneur will affect their likelihood of success with venture capitalists,” he explains. For example, Guedj examines whether the entrepreneur has previously worked in the pharmaceutical or biotech industries or if the person is an academic. He also studies which universities produce academic entrepreneurs and whether the school’s location (say in Cambridge or San Diego) figures in to pharmaceutical ventures.

Guedj is nearly finished collecting data for his upcoming paper, “What Makes Successful Entrepreneurs?” with Professor David Scharfstein of Harvard Business School.

Paul Martorana

Paul Martorana

Paul Martorana 
Management Department

When employees in low positions are unhappy with their work situation, what is it that leads them to retaliate?

“It’s not just anger that motivates people to act,” says Paul Martorana, assistant professor of management. “It’s also positive characteristics such as pride and self esteem. A sense of power creates resistance.”

Martorana’s research focuses on normative and non-normative (extreme) approaches people in low positions take to challenge status hierarchies.

“Some people don’t act extremely, but they act within their roles,” he says.

Martorana combined lessons learned while earning his bachelor’s degree in psychology at the University of California at Berkeley with research conducted for his May 2005 Ph.D. in management and organizations from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University.

He hopes his work studying the implications of employee retaliation at the corporate level will help employees find ways to make changes in normative (nonextreme) behavior and help companies prevent loss.

“I really think business people can change the world,” Martorana says, describing why he entered management research after obtaining his psychology degree. “What professors research can influence popular culture. I would like to have an impact on MBAs.”

This spring he is teaching Negotiations at the MBA level. In July 2005, he presented his work on varieties of action to change status hierarchies at the 14th Tri-Annual General Meeting of the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology in Würzburg, Germany and offered “Women and Work: Perspectives for the 21st Century” to the Academy of Management in Honolulu.

His research on female mentorship and women and work also earned Martorana a faculty fellow position for the Center for Women and Gender Studies Faculty Development Program at UT Austin. Martorana’s research has been published in a variety of scholarly journals, including the Journal of Applied Psychology, Social Judgements: Implicit and Explicit Processes, and Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

Michael Williamson

Michael Williamson

Michael Williamson 
Accounting Department

Before setting foot on The University of Texas at Austin campus, Michael Williamson already knew he would fit in well at the McCombs School. As a doctoral student last year, he met several McCombs faculty members at conferences outside of Texas and got a taste of the open and supportive academic culture at McCombs.

The quality of the faculty convinced him to join the McCombs School as an assistant professor in the Department of Accounting in fall 2005.

Before obtaining his Ph.D. in accounting at the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University, Williamson completed his bachelor’s degree in accounting at Louisiana State University and worked as a senior consultant for Ernst & Young for four years. He went on to earn his master of information systems degree from Carnegie Mellon University and a master in business degree from the Kelley School.

“Since my undergraduate work, I wanted to be a professor,” Williamson recalls. “But I wanted to get some experience first.”

While Williamson says he enjoyed working as a consultant, his first love is the classroom. This spring, he is teaching honors Management Accounting for undergrads—the same course he taught for five years as an associate instructor at the Kelley School.

Williamson’s main research interests include studying how to design reward systems that allow employee authority in an organization.

In his dissertation, “The Effects of Expanding Employee Decision Making on Firm Value in an Implicit Contracting Setting,” Williamson found that giving employees more authority in the workplace increases performance—to a certain point. As you continue to allow more of this responsibility, the performance begins to drop off.

“Some people don’t like to play the full role,” he says.

In November 2004, his paper, “The Evolution from Taylorism to Employee Gainsharing: A Case Study Examining John Deere’s Continuous Improvement Pay Plan,” co-authored by Geoffrey Sprinkle, was published in Issues in Accounting Education.

Back to top


 
Email E-mail this page          Print Print this page